body~politic

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Gang rape epidemic in London - police try to give a rational explanation!

Violent, degrading group sex, if not gang rape, is often a rite of passage for members or 'soldiers' as they style themselves - such as losing your virginity or going to the pub would be for other young men.

The majority of victims - 60 per cent - were white, while 28 per cent were black.

Scotland Yard identified certain characteristics among attackers. Around 40 per cent of suspects were described as Afro-Caribbean. A further 13 per cent were of Indian or Pakistani appearance.

Officers insist that this is not a race issue, simply a reflection that most gang rapes take place in the most deprived boroughs, which have disproportionately high ethnic populations.

[ Race is not an issue say the police, and they explain why, but it makes no logical sense. If the areas where most of these rapes are happening have "disproportionately high ethnic populations" then why aren't the victims also mainly from these ethnic populations, rather than white women? They can get away with saying this kind of lie because so few of us can spot it. And that is even more scary than the rape epidemic itself! ]

Friday, December 5, 2008

Further archaeological discoveries on the mysterious white tribe of Peru's Amazon

The remote nature of the site appears to have protected the site from looters as archaeologists found ceramics and undisturbed burial sites.

They were eventually wiped out by small pox and other diseases brought by the Europeans.

The women of the Chachapoya were much prized by the Incas as they were tall and fair skinned. The Chronicler Pedro Cieza de León offers wrote of the Chachapoyas.

"They are the whitest and most handsome of all the people that I have seen in Indies, and their wives were so beautiful that because of their gentleness, many of them deserved to be the Incas' wives and to also be taken to the Sun Temple."

[ If history could be freely researched and documented without the constraints against telling the true story of the white race, people would have a very different view of the world. Arthur Kemp's "March of the Titans" is a good, although not perfect, attempt. ]

Arguments over the ethics of abandoning a child with Down's Syndrome

Eugenics is one of those knock-down words used to silence argument. It was used several times last week, in radio discussions and articles about women choosing to give birth to babies with Down's syndrome.

The subject came up partly as advance publicity for a Sky Real Lives television documentary this Wednesday about a heroic young woman who adopted seven babies with Down's, whose mothers had rejected them. There was also a BBC news story last week suggesting that more women these days are knowingly choosing to give birth to babies with Down's.

In fact the news story was misleading.

More or less disguised was a strong tone of moral disapproval of anyone who feels that the birth of a Down’s baby is a misfortune, to be avoided if possible. Hardly anyone now dares to say so. The word "eugenics" is often used by Down's lobbyists to make the nasty suggestion that people who think it is right to abort a foetus with a Down's diagnosis are as bad as Nazis. This is argument by abuse.

[ Mongoloids and other similarly disabled children should be humanely killed at birth, it must be painful to have to decide to give the child into state care to have a horrible life, but that's still better than keeping it. Most healthy normal people have times as teenagers when they even contemplate suicide, so how cruel it is to perpetuate the life of a child who is at best nothing other than a pet for the parent determined to raise it, and at worst a huge burden upon them and upon the taxpayer to no positive end. In the Soviet Union disabled children were put in state care and also a bucket of water was kept where the mother gave birth and severely sub-standard infants were immediately drowned. It is only in modern times that it has become normal in the west to regard the disabled as if they were more important than the unimpaired. This is dysgenics. It even goes against "the golden rule" to "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" so it is hypocritical of liberals to overlook that fact. ]

Twitter

-view CSL mobile version -



Webring Translator Thingamajig